Economist Marty Wolfson Says “Right to Work” Lowers Wages

Author: Kate Garry

Marty Wolfson

Indiana lawmakers and residents can expect heated debate as the Indiana House voted 8-5 this morning to send the “Right to Work” bill to the full House.

Indiana Republicans back the bill because of its potential to attract business to the Hoosier state with lower labor costs, which some believe ultimately will increase workers’ wages.

University of Notre Dame labor economist Marty Wolfson disputes that argument.

“The Indiana Chamber of Commerce report on Right to Work (RTW) states that higher incomes will come about from more businesses relocating to Indiana due to lower labor costs. This is the logic of the RTW argument, but it is a rather uncomfortable and contradictory argument to make — that we need to lower the wages of workers in Indiana in order to improve incomes,” says Wolfson, associate professor of economics and director of Notre Dame’s Higgins Labor Studies Program.

A fact sheet from the National Institute for Labor Relations (NILRR) in 2011 states that the cost of living-adjusted compensation per private sector employee is $1,155 higher in RTW states than in non-RTW states.

“Unfortunately, the data analysis conducted by NILRR has significant methodological problems and does not prove anything about what will happen if Indiana passes a RTW law,” Wolfson counters.

“The NILRR analysis compares compensation (wages plus benefits) for private-sector employees. There is no reason to exclude public-sector employees from this analysis. Indeed, there is a particular reason to include them, since public-sector employees are more highly unionized than are private-sector employees.”

Wolfson’s research focuses on the effects of the financial markets on working people, globalization and local economic development. Prior to his appointment at Notre Dame, he was an economist at the Federal Reserve Board in Washington, D.C.

Learn More >

Originally published at