Pinderhughes insists on the best of both worlds

Author: Arts and Letters


Hybrids and blends had defined Dianne Pinderhughes’ destiny long before an academic career that bridges two departments — long before she was born, in fact.

In 1902, her great-grandmother petitioned a Providence, R.I., court to change the family name from Hughes to Pinderhughes. Great-grandmother’s maiden name was Pinder, and she wanted it preserved.

“If someone tells me they’ve met a Pinderhughes, it’s bound to be one of my cousins,” says the professor who is in her first year on the Notre Dame faculty. “It’s a fun name.”

Dual interests began marking her career early on. It is firmly planted in political science — she is, in fact, president-elect of the American Political Science Association. But since her first appointment in the government department of Dartmouth College, she has been involved in the burgeoning field of African-American studies.

At Dartmouth, she served on the advisory committee for the African and African-American studies program. She then held a joint appointment at University of Illinois in political science and the Department of African-American studies, which she directed for 13 years.

Pinderhughes has reviewed the impact of African-American studies programs at several Ivy League and state universities as a consultant for the Ford Foundation.

“We concluded that they had been very important in really energizing the liberal arts in ways that would not have been possible without those programs,” she says.

Along with gender studies, the programs have helped open up departments in liberal arts to “different conceptual and theoretical approaches,” she says.

Pinderhughes’ research interests include voting rights issues and racial and ethnic politics. Next semester she will introduce a course on black Chicago politics, and the students, she says, already seem to be buzzing about it.

“Profound and intense segregation” characterizes Chicago, says Pinderhughes.

She plans to have students examine the overall demographic, historic, cultural and economic patterns that have led to a “racially self-conscious approach to public life.”

Pinderhughes came to the attention of the Africana Studies faculty because her students were often accepted as Erskine Peters Dissertation Year Fellows, a Notre Dame program for outstanding African-American doctoral candidates in the arts, humanities and social sciences. She had, herself, known Peters and she had worked on professional committees with political science chair Rodney Hero.

When friends learned she was leaving the more diverse Illinois campus for Notre Dame, they openly wondered what cadre of scholars she’d be joining. “There’s no one there,” they would comment.

Her pool of colleagues may be smaller than at her previous posts, “but like the rest of the University, they’re very careful, deliberate, thoughtful people.”

She appreciates that Notre Dame recognizes the gifts of its African-American scholars with administrative appointments, which is the case with Richard Pierce, chair of Africana Studies; Hugh Page, dean of First Year of Studies, and Don Pope-Davis, interim vice president for graduate studies and research. And she appreciates the additional influences of Hispanic politics, through the work of Hero, and the gender-related political analysis done by Christina Wolbrecht.

Bridging two academic worlds already, she also is casting her attention toward the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, whose work is compatible with her interest in racial, ethnic and political comparisons between the U.S. and such countries as Brazil. Interdisciplinary by nature, Kellogg is well suited to accommodate such interests.

Originally published by Gail Hinchion Mancini at on December 06, 2006.